As I stressed last week, there is a difference between
journalism and criticism. Journalism is the pursuit and sharing of truth and
knowledge. Criticism is the analysis and evaluation of varying works. Those
works, within the context of things this blog is dedicated to, are videogames
and will forever be videogames. And still within that context I like to think
of myself as a videogame critic. …
Actually, no. Not just within the context of the blog I run.
This is a resolution
made public to the entire internet that I, Steven of The Age of Gaming,
consider myself and hope to be taken seriously as a videogame critic.
Then what is entailed for being a videogame critic? Everyone
has opinions, what is there to say that mine are better than someone else’s?
Nothing. There is nothing. I accept and embrace that fact because it means that
everyone has a valid right to their opinion and a valid right to express it as
they please. Because what is criticism if nothing more than one person’s
opinion engaging with another’s?
All opinions are valid yet, differences in how the said
opinions are handled matter. Screaming and shouting are not effective methods
of expression. Neither is saying nothing. It is with tempered, well-thought and
researched speech that opinions can be properly expressed and shared. This is
my belief in what separates criticism from standard opinions. These are also
the standards in which I will follow.
It is because I focus on criticism that I hereby choose to
forgo breaking news reporting and game reviewing. For one thing, it would be impossible
for me to keep track and report on the breaking news as it happens. However, I
will try to remain topical in my focus. Staying away from reviews so far has
been an almost subconscious choice. Every website that accepts pitches for
articles always warns that unsolicited reviews will be instantly ignored. That
scared me off. Also it is within my personal belief that I could never compete
with a review of my own to that of any other publication. So I shied away from
reviews. At this time I feel just in making my stance official: The Age of Gaming will not review
videogames.
When and if I have something to say about a game I will write
about it in the format accustom to this blog. Because there are already enough
people saying what is good and what is bad, what to buy and what not to; I want
to take a step back from that and examine why it is good or why it is bad,
where a game succeeds and where it fails. There is often more to learn from a
game that does something wrong than one that does everything right.
I previously wrote a book review of sorts seeing how the
book related so strongly to videogames. In the future more game related reviews
may present themselves or they may not. Honestly, I am not sure yet. Perhaps I
shall rework the format into a long form critique of newer material. Or maybe
that is just the definition of review. The future is unknown and shall concern
me when it arrives.
I would like to end this post by saying I have no freaking
idea where all this formality came from. I want to sound intelligent, but I don’t
want to sound like I have stick up my butt. So yeah …. there’s that. And I would like to say that I don’t do
reviews, but I cannot get to a long from critique of every game I play. Because
of that I have assembled a short list of every game I have played since
starting this blog and no more than two sentences with my thoughts about them:
·
Ico HD Edition – Some of the puzzles could
have been better implemented or explained. Built a strong and unique
relationship the likes of which I have never seen before.
·
Fallout: New Vegas – Fantastic world with
engrossing mythology and excellently implemented. Actual game play could use some
work.
·
Journey – I cried. This game made me cry
and never would have wanted it another way.
·
Flower – Gives the player an unprecedented
freedom of movement that makes you realize how restricting other games are.
Really confusing ending.
·
Metro: Last Light – Above average stealth
for a first-person shooter along with a strong narrative and world. Actual
shooting is just average.
·
Far Cry 3 – I did not finish the game.
Killed Vass, but then all my player agency was ruined because of poorly executed
narrative and gameplay conceits.
·
The Last of Us – One of the best games I
have ever played.
·
God of War HD Edition – I missed you,
Kratos. Finding you again brought joy to my life.
·
Borderlands 2 – Fun shooting and
leveling, but a weak and drawn out narrative. Also some supposedly funny, but
in fact really annoying characters and missions.
·
Spec Ops: The Line – Made me rethink everything
I thought I knew about war games and videogames in general. Fantastic.